Comparison: manual vs. automated
Drone Log vs. the manual flight verification process
Manually checking a drone flight means opening several official sources, reading NOTAMs in PDF and entering coordinates by hand. Drone Log automates these steps and cuts the time from ~15 minutes to ~2 minutes.
Step-by-step comparison
| Step | Manual | Drone Log |
|---|---|---|
| Estimated time | ~15 minutes | ~2 minutes |
| Number of steps | ~8 steps | 4 steps |
| UAS zone check | Manual search on the ROMATSA map | Automatic, on an interactive map |
| Reading NOTAMs | Manual PDF, coded text | Automatic, in plain language |
| Coordinates | Entered manually | Automatic (GPS / click on map) |
| Flight log | Filled in manually | Generated automatically |
| Total | ~15 minutes, 8 steps | ~2 minutes, 4 steps |
Benefits of automation
Cut pre-flight preparation time by over 85% — check zones and NOTAMs from a single place.
Coordinates and restrictions are filled in automatically, removing manual transcription mistakes.
UAS zones and NOTAMs are imported automatically from official sources, with the last update date shown.
The flight log and documents are generated automatically, ready to present when needed.
Anonymised examples of generated requests
These examples show what HG859 documents look like when generated from Drone Log after a map check. All data is fictional and anonymised — not from real users.
Demonstration only. Always verify current authority requirements and official sources before submitting.
In short
Drone Log reduces pre-flight verification from about 15 minutes and 8 manual steps (ROMATSA maps, NOTAM PDFs, manually entered coordinates) to roughly 2 minutes and 4 steps, with official data imported automatically and a flight log generated automatically.